Sunday, 17 February 2013

§44

Wittgenstein makes the point again that whether a sign loses its meaning when its bearer is gone depends upon the language game - whether it has a use in the language game when the bearer is gone. We could imagine a language game where names are always used only in the presence of the bearer and so could be replaced by 'this' or 'that' in every case.

No comments:

Post a Comment